Horwitz’s article centered on the idea of how meals, the
position of food in our lives, and the food itself has changed over the last 50
years or so. “Eating at the edge” is a termed he apparently coined, and he
describes it as “…occasions when food is
an additive to a situation…rather than being definitive.” Eating is no longer
something that we do on its own, but it is something that we do with our hands
while our mind or body might be otherwise occupied, much like a cigarette in
our hand while we are in a lecture hall, an example he cited in his own
experience as a student and professor.
People are eating smaller portions more frequently, and this
has come to mean that portable, quick foods eaten in this manner are less
substantial and more artificial than a large prepared meal eaten less
frequently throughout the day. Two examples that he used that I thought were
very weighty in both the past and present were Swanson’s TV dinners and
Campbell’s Soup at Hand. Swanson’s idea came after Thanksgiving when there was
a surplus of leftover Turkeys. Thanksgiving dinner is the most widely
recognized, organized meal in most American minds, and he takes this and turns
it into a single meal that we pull out of the freezer and eat in little more
than the time it takes to walk it from the freezer to the microwave. With the
dinner, even TV is more convenient to our schedule with the advent of DVR.
Nothing is sacred to the time-cutthroat consumer these days. Another example
was Campbell’s Soup at Hand. Soup takes time to properly prepare; the stewing
of flavors usually takes hours to properly blend all the ingredients. Now, soup
is ready made and packed into a Styrofoam cup to be (again) microwaved and
transported in its own cup with a mouth spout, no spoon required! Food is
barely eaten anymore, maybe eventually we will just toss little freeze-dried
globs of food at our faces and hope we hit our mouths!
Horwitz seems to think this is an American problem,
predominantly. NASA and the international space stations are the next subject
of his analysis. American astronauts are more inclined to eat on their own
while they are doing other work. Other European astronauts like to eat in each
other’s company, sacrificing productivity for the company of their only other
companions for miles! There are even paid positions in the US that make sure
the Americans get along with their European counterparts way up in space.
I have noticed many of these same things as Horwitz has. I
consider myself to be a very organized, regimental person. I love sitting down
to eat in a generally standard time as it pertains to classes. 11: 30 to 12 for
lunch, 5:30 to 6 for dinner. Breakfast is different since I have rowing
practice from 6-7: 30 every morning, and I usually eat a number of protein and
calorie heavy snacks while I do last minute homework. But with this exception,
I try to have as balanced of meals when they fit into my schedule best, and I
hate eating on the go. I don’t even like to go to the drive through. I am an
old man, and I embrace that quality about myself, and I like eating three well-rounded
meals whenever I can! I think I end up eating healthier that way as well, which
obviously is very subjective and varies depending on the food itself, but it
makes me feel better after I’ve eaten. Company doesn’t matter quite as much,
but every good meal is made exponentially better with friends. I think our
insistence on convenience for food says a little about our relationships as
well, let’s just hope we care about the quality of our friends a little more
than the quality of the processed food we eat on the go!
No comments:
Post a Comment